Since 2014, nearly 42% of failed cryptocurrency exchanges have disappeared without a trace for no apparent reason – Bitcoin News Exchange

Recently, published a report showing the number of failed cryptocurrency exchanges over the past eight years. Interestingly, the researcher’s data shows that 42% of failed crypto-asset trading platforms disappeared without a trace, giving users no explanation as to why the exchange was shut down.

Over the past eight years, research has shown that only 22% of failed crypto exchanges are left due to actual business-related reasons

  • A report covering failed cryptocurrency exchanges notes that 42% of all exchanges that have failed since 2014 have not provided reasons as to why businesses falter and exchanges essentially disappear from the industry without warning.
  • 22% of failed cryptocurrency exchanges over the past eight years remain due to actual business reasons, according to research. 9% of trading platforms turned out to be outright scams and fraudulent acts from the start.

Since 2014, nearly 42% of failed cryptocurrency exchanges have disappeared without a trace for no apparent reason

  • The report states that, “After 23 exchanges were made in 2018, this number rose 252% in 2019, before rising by another 17% in 2020.” Staying at the same level in 2021, this year’s improvement finally occurred, with a 55% reduction in failures if the rest of the year is beyond the first six months.”
  • In a comment sent to News, Dan Ashmore, CFA Data and Crypto Analyst at, explained that such metrics should be cleaned up. Ashmore noted that “if cryptocurrency is taken seriously and fully proves itself, it needs to continue to clean up its image and leave compelling statistics like this behind.”
  • Moreover, the report notes that while 2022 is not over yet, the year is expected to see a 55% drop in total crypto exchange failures. “In terms of the amount that simply vanishes into thin air, one can expect this to drop — regulation is still far behind, but at least it has made progress and should make it more difficult for exchanges to disappear without a trace,” the magazine. Adds net report.
  • The report comes at a time when countless crypto companies are suffering financially from the crypto winter. Layoffs have spread across the crypto industry over the past few months as thousands of crypto employees have been laid off.
  • Moreover, three major bankruptcies have prompted Celsius, Three Arrows Capital (3AC), and Voyager Digital to file for bankruptcy protection. At least half a dozen cryptocurrency exchanges have frozen withdrawals.
  • Last Wednesday, the Zipmex trading platform Paused withdrawals She suffers from “financial difficulties [from] of our major trading partners” due to the downturn in the cryptocurrency market.
  • After the pause, the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) asked Zipmex why it had paused withdrawals in message Posted on Wednesday.

Tags in this story

2014, 22, 42%, 8 Years, Bankruptcies, Percentage, Crypto Exchanges, Crypto Lenders, Crypto Exchanges, Crypto Winter, Crypto Data Analyst, Dan Ashmore, Exchanges, Failed Crypto Exchanges, Frozen Withdrawals , Percentages, Thailand SEC, Three Stocks Capital (3AC), Voyager Digital, Zipmex

What do you think of the research report published by Tell us what you think about it in the comments section below.

Jimmy Redman

Jamie Redman is the head of news at News and a technology financial journalist based in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,700 articles for News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

photo credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons,

disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services or companies. It does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the Company nor the author shall be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

اترك تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني.

زر الذهاب إلى الأعلى